Letter to the Editor: The Economist
15 January 2006
Sir,
Your recent lead article (Good Food, 9/12/06) manages to both praise
and condemn ethical shoppers, whilst fundamentally misrepresenting
the supply-and-demand basis on which the international Fairtrade
system works.
Consumers willingly buy Fairtrade products, knowing that whatever
price they pay at the till, the producer organisations have received
an agreed and stable price, and money to invest in their own communities.
In fact, price differentials for shoppers are rapidly diminishing
as economies of scale are derived from this growing market. At the
producer end, Fairtrade is not a subsidy but a market responsive
mechanism. It does not fix prices at a local level: certified producers
still need to contract with buyers prepared to trade under agreed
Fairtrade terms, and many continue to sell into both conventional
and Fairtrade markets.
Your overproduction theories are unfounded. Producer communities
are all too aware of the risks of over-reliance on one commodity,
and quick to seize on the new opportunities that involvement in
the Fairtrade scheme may open up. Far from increasing production
(unless responding to specific additional demands), Fairtrade farmers’
groups frequently invest in developing their market knowledge, in
building up their export or processing capability, or in diversification
programmes, all of which require investment. Examples include coffee
growers developing citrus or macadamia nuts, banana farmers moving
into other premium tropical produce, or investment in alternative
income-generation projects such as eco-tourism, or in community
health and education programmes.
As an active and founding member of the Trade Justice Movement
(campaigning for greater government action in making international
trade rules work better in tackling sustainable development), the
Fairtrade Foundation has always promoted the need for people to
exercise both their political and consumer power. As the Economist
rightly concludes, the rise of the ethical shopping movement sends
a powerful signal to governments of the public appetite for change
on these issues. Equally powerful signs of hope lie in the thousands
of small victories being won at local level by producer communities
able to invest in processing facilities, better schools, health
clinics, clean water, internet access, recycling schemes as a result
of selling to Fairtrade markets. As Raymond Kimaro of the Kilimanjaro
Native Co-operative Union commented at G8 events in Edinburgh: “Pay
us a fair price for our coffee, and we will make poverty history
for ourselves.”
Barbara Crowther
Head of Communications
The Fairtrade Foundation,
Room 204, 16 Baldwin’s Gardens,
London EC1N 7RJ.